Tag: Photography

  • Long-eared Owl (You Are What You Eat) – “stained glass” art puzzle & “crystal” stand

    Long-eared Owl (You Are What You Eat) – “stained glass” art puzzle & “crystal” stand

    Artist: Michael Autumn
    Medium: Tinted/transparent/translucent/frosted/fluorescent, and opalescent cast 3mm Perspexยฎ – laser cut & engraved from a hand-drawn digital design (with 3mm and 5mm crystal clear magnetised support panels)
    Size: 19cm (W) x 29cm (H)
    Edition: Unlimited
    Date: 07/2024
    Country: UK
    For sale: A selection of colour variations is available to buy on Etsy – https://michaelautumnart.etsy.com

    TL;DR

    Using coloured acrylics for creating stained glass effects offers a great number of opportunities and there seems to be nothing that cannot be achieved using it compared to conventional stained glass techniques and real glass. I’m very encouraged by the future possibilities of using coloured acrylics, and have several designs already in mind. Watch this space…


    Description: The idea behind this artwork was to have a tactile, life-sized, long-eared owl, and to toy with the idea โ€“ โ€œYou are what you eatโ€. This is my first foray into using coloured acrylics as a modern stained glass substitute. Stained glass (windows) is a really beautiful medium – not least because, unlike most other art forms, it constantly changes with light and the colour of the (sun)light shining through it. However, just like buildings today don’t have to be made from the same building materials and techniques used by the cathedral-building Normans in the mediaeval period, stained glass windows donโ€™t have to be made with silica, lime, and soda, coloured with metallic salts โ€“ and held together with strips of lead.

    Detail of a 13th-century window from Chartres Cathedral
    By Vassil – Own work, Public Domain, Link

    I personally donโ€™t see the point in replicating materials and techniques that have been used โ€“ and mastered – for centuries. I donโ€™t live in the past; I live in the present. Some artists and artisans of the past can, at best (and with extreme effort), be matched – but it’s exceedingly unlikely that they can be surpassed. Iโ€™m talking about the likes of Grinling Gibbons, Ingres, Peter Bruegel the Elder, Jan van Eyke, Albrecht Dรผrer, Gian Lorenzo Bernini (sculptor) โ€“ not to mention the often anonymous mediaeval stained-glass window artists.

    I can learn from the past, but learning is not the same a replicating. As an artist, Iโ€™m always looking to create something new โ€“ or say something new. And a constant challenge is to create something different โ€“ something that stands out from the crowd, and hasnโ€™t been done before. In my opinion, in the art world it’s a waste of time to do what someone has done beforeโ€ฆ That is what an artisan does โ€“ not an artistโ€ฆ

    The Poor Man's Bible Window from Canterbury Cathedral
    By Template:Unknown 13th century Stained Glass artists – TTaylor, photo 2005, put together from two photos, and ajusted. Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain, Link

    Glass is a truly wonderful, diverse, and lovely material โ€“ particularly with its ability to be coloured (tinted) – but it has its limitations. The old severe limitations of cutting it have been completely overcome by the use of modern day lasers, but itโ€™s very brittle, sharp, and dangerous! This leaves one with the option to work within glassโ€™s limitations, resort to cast moulding (and its limitations), or look for alternative materials that achieve similar resultsโ€ฆ

    Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is the synthetic polymer derived from methyl methacrylate. It is used as an engineering plastic, and it is a transparent thermoplastic. PMMA is also known as acrylic, acrylic glass, as well as by the trade names and brands Crylux, Hesalite, Plexiglas, Acrylite, Lucite, and Perspex, among several others (see below). This plastic is often used in sheet form as a lightweight or shatter-resistant alternative to glass. It can also be used as a casting resin, in inks and coatings, and for many other purposes.
    It is often technically classified as a type of glass, in that it is a non-crystalline vitreous substanceโ€”hence its occasional historic designation as acrylic glass.

    Wikipedia

    Clear cast acrylic already matches conventional glass in many respects โ€“ and in some cases surpasses it. Clear acrylic can transmit up to 97% of light passing through it (compared to more like 90% in normal glass), itโ€™s less dense (and therefore lighter for the same volume) than glass (but up to 20 times stronger), doesnโ€™t shatter like glass, is nowhere near as sharp โ€“ and therefore much safer to handle. Acrylic, like glass, can be cut with a laser. This last point is extremely important because the laser literally vaporises the acrylic in its very narrow path. This allows for extremely intricate cutting. Iโ€™ve achieved approximately 1mm wide cuts in a 3mm thick sheet – see below :-

    I do quite a lot of museum-level picture framing, and it’s noteworthy that acrylic glass is the โ€œglassโ€ of choice for practically every museum. Like glass, it can be painted on, and it’s naturally more UV blocking than glass. So the only downside to using acrylic that I can think of is that it’s much softer, and therefore more easily scratched, than glass โ€“ and so it needs to be handled very carefully (but so does glass…!).

    After successfully managing to very intricately and smoothly cut and engrave clear 3mm & 5mm acrylic in this artwork โ€“

    โ€ฆI thought it would be extremely interesting to try cutting and engraving coloured 3mm acrylic sheets (this is the thickness with the widest range of colours available) โ€“ to see how it performs as a stained glass substitute.

    Most of the range of colours of acrylic available

    I didnโ€™t envisage any problems โ€“ except perhaps that some colours may require more cutting power than others (greater reflectance of bright colours verses albedo effect of dark colours). But this turned out not to be the case, and the cutting was a breeze.

    In fact I was confident enough that cutting coloured acrylic would be doable (having gotten comfortable with cutting 3 & 5mm clear acrylic), that I decided to go full in, and bought 44 different colour/tint/frost/florescence/opalescence sheets (at not inconsiderable expense) โ€“ one for each of the pieces of the long-eared owl art puzzle!

    44 sheets of different colour/tint/frost/florescence/opalescence sheets of acrylic

    I thought it would make a great artwork for each of the 44 pieces to be a different colour and/or opacity. And I would be able to make 44 random-coloured/effects art puzzlesโ€ฆ (I had to make do with some opaque colours because there simply werenโ€™t enough transparent/translucent colours available โ€“ but I thought the variety of translucency in itself could be very different and interestingโ€ฆ)

    Assembling 44 different art puzzles from 44 single-coloured puzzles took a long time and was very painstaking…

    I envisioned that the โ€œstained glassโ€ art puzzle would look best on a windowsill (or similar), so I planned that the art puzzle(s) should be sandwiched between two sheets of magnetised clear panels (3mm for the front and 5mm for the back โ€“ the latter for greater stiffness), and stood on 10mm thick (for better stability) mice โ€œfeetโ€ โ€“ so I also ordered in enough clear cast acrylic for these.

    10mm thick custom cut and engrave crystal clear mice “feet” to display the art puzzle on e.g. a windowsill

    Cutting the circular recesses in both the sandwiching clear sheets of acrylic to snugly fit the 10mm diameter x 2mm thick neodymium magnets took a bit of working out and experimentation โ€“ particularly given that I was drilling into 3mm material and had to leave 0.5mm for glue โ€“ leaving only 0.5mm material left! I originally tried to use a bench drill and a positioning jig for the acrylic pieces, but that seemed too risky, and with 352 recesses to cut (2 x 4 x 44) โ€“ too time-consuming. I then tried to use a CNC router and a positioning jig. But that wasnโ€™t accurate enough across all four corners โ€“ and getting perfect registration of the sunken recesses across two different thickness of acrylic seemed problematic. In the end I thought the easiest and most accurate way to bore out the recesses was to engrave them with the laser. This took a bit of experimentation to get the correct depth, but I got there in the end. Also, the rough bottoms made a good biting surface for the glue used to fix the magnets in place.

    Recesses engraved into the corners of the clear acrylic support panels to hold the magnets in place.
    Magnet glued into a clear panel such that the top is level with the clear acrylic support panel’s surface

    Conventional stained glass windows have to be strong enough to hold their own weight and withstand the worst weather they are likely to face, and to achieve this there is a great deal of strength built into, and around, them. All the individual glass pieces are welded together in the form of soldered H-sectioned lead strips. This relatively flimsy carcass is supported by being fixed to metal and/or masonry frame/s.

    The Passion of Christ: the Capture and Crucifixion, Saint-Pierre, Limours, Essonne, France (1520).
    By GFreihalter – Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

    However, the approximately 10mm wide lead H-section strips are what on the one hand give conventional stained glass itโ€™s traditional thick wire-frame look, but on the other hand means the stained glass pieces themselves are very basic and simple shapes. This low resolution can be largely overcome by over-painting, but the pronounced wire-frame effect of the lead strips is a given. Some people may like this effect, and, to be fair, the further away you stand away, the less intrusive it looks.

    Musรฉe de Cluny students at work in a stained glass workshop - assembling glass with came
    By Ariane Corisande – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

    Coloured acrylic provides a completely alternative modern approach. The โ€œstained glassโ€ can be sandwiched between two clear sheets of acrylic (or glass), and optionally the whole design can be fixed in a frame and placed anywhere… There is no need for leading – or faux leading – at all. For practical purposes itโ€™s useful to have a small gap between the pieces โ€“ if, for no other reason, to be able to assemble (and optionally disassemble) the pieces. This can be quite advantageous because on close inspection it provides for a halo of a thin gap of light between and around the pieces – see photo below :-

    What’s more, unlike welded-in stained glass pieces, because the acrylic pieces are not fixed in position (they cannot move if supported around the sides), the whole design lends itself to be a (jigsaw) puzzle as well as a decorative beautiful “stained glass” artworkโ€ฆ This simply requires that there be some way to easily open the framed sandwich – hence why I chose to use simple magnets to hold the three panels together…

    Not having leading means literally more light comes through, but, on the positive side, leading more clearly defined the edges of shapes – and so may be preferred for that reason. However, there is nothing to stop you using leading, faux leading, piping, or indeed a purpose-cut lattice of opaque black (or any other colour) acrylic – if a shape-outlining effect is desired…

    In conclusion, using coloured acrylics for creating stained glass effects offers a great number of opportunities and there is seems to be nothing that cannot be achieved using it compared to conventional stained glass techniques and real glass. I’m very encouraged by the future possibilities of using coloured acrylics, and have several designs already in mind. Watch this space…


    Long-eared owls are ferocious predators (as are all owls) โ€“ and will basically eat anything that moves that is smaller than them. They often swallow their prey whole, and regurgitate a large pellet of the undigestible parts โ€“ such as bones, teeth, hair, feathers. Indeed, examining their pellets is how ornithologists know so much about what they eat.

    This is a precision laser-cut and engraved โ€œartโ€ puzzle – directly cut and engraved in premium 3mm coloured cast acrylic from an original digital hand-drawing. The design is a specially modified version of my original hand-cut 40mm thick solid oak artwork entitled โ€œLong-eared Owl (Art Puzzle) (You are what you eat)โ€ (2022)

    Long-eared Owl (Art Puzzle) – 40mm thick oak wood

    (see https://michaelautumn.wordpress.com/2023/05/03/long-eared-owl-jigsaw-puzzle-you-are-what-you-eat/ and https://youtu.be/jWsK6TFEevk).


    Gallery

    I have created a few stained glass designs in the past – using stick-on lead piping and coloured glass inks. At the time I was happy enough with them, but they weren’t very good. The solidity of the colours wasn’t there, and the colours faded over time. I do find there is something magical about transparent materials โ€“ as well as them being beautiful because their appearance changes dramatically from different angles, and by the changing light falling on them.

    Here are a few of the many varieties I have made :-

  • Long-eared Owl (You Are What You Eat) – “crystal” art puzzle & “crystal” stand

    Long-eared Owl (You Are What You Eat) – “crystal” art puzzle & “crystal” stand

    Artist: Michael Autumn
    Medium: Clear cast 5mm Perspexยฎ – laser cut & engraved from a hand-drawn digital design
    Size: 19cm (W) x 29cm (H) (including stand)
    Edition: Unlimited
    Date: 05/2024
    Country: UK
    For sale: Available to buy on Etsy – https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/1741855133/long-eared-owl-you-are-what-you-eat

    Description: The idea behind this artwork was to have a tactile, life-sized, long-eared owl, and to toy with the idea โ€“ โ€œYou are what you eatโ€. Long-eared owls are ferocious predators (as are all owls) โ€“ and will basically eat anything that moves that is smaller than them. They often swallow their prey whole, and regurgitate a large pellet of the undigestible parts โ€“ such as bones, teeth, hair, feathers. Indeed, examining their pellets is how ornithologists know so much about what they eat.

    This is a precision laser-cut and engraved โ€œartโ€ puzzle – directly cut and engraved in premium 5mm clear cast acrylic from an original digital hand-drawing. The design is a specially modified version of my original hand-cut 40mm thick solid oak artwork entitled โ€œLong-eared Owl (Art Puzzle) (You are what you eat)โ€ (2022)

    Long-eared Owl (Art Puzzle) – 40mm thick oak wood

    (see https://michaelautumn.wordpress.com/2023/05/03/long-eared-owl-jigsaw-puzzle-you-are-what-you-eat/ and https://youtu.be/jWsK6TFEevk).


    Iโ€™ve been longing to create something in clear glass or acrylic for many years because I find there is something magical about transparent materials โ€“ as well as them being beautiful because their appearance changes dramatically from different angles, and by the changing light falling on them.

  • Royal Academy Summer Exhibition – Open Letter

    Dear Royal Academy Summer Exhibition,

    Ever since submissions of works for consideration to the annual Summer Exhibition have had to be done solely by photographs of the works – rather than sending in the actual works – I have felt very uncomfortable and uneasy about the selection process.

    Firstly, judging an artwork by a relatively small photograph on a small computer screen (of who-knows what qualityโ€ฆ?) is a very disingenuous way of seeing art. This disproportionately disadvantages large works compared with smaller ones. Also it disproportionately disadvantages colourful, compared with monochrome, works. And the quality of the photographs may not do the image justice… I imagine some of the widely established best works of art in history would be rejected based on up to three 1920 x 1080 pixel photographs seen on a computer screenโ€ฆ

    Secondly, I am especially concerned by the request for certain pieces of information on the application forms โ€“ information that should have absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the selection process. Whether this seemingly irrelevant information is used in the selection process or not is simply not know, but the mere fact that it is requested – and with the process not being transparent โ€“ leaves this open to questionโ€ฆ

    • Why do you need to know if we have exhibited at the Summer Exhibition before?!
    • Why do you need to know if we are a Friend of the Royal Academy?!
    • Why do you need to know the price of the work (you can ask for this if the work is selected)?

    The trouble of this covert digital selection process is that we have no way of even knowing if our photos are reviewed at all โ€“ or whether they are simply filtered out as rejects based on arbitrary, but irrelevant, information – or due to some other covert agendaโ€ฆ Who knows if preference is given to Friends of the RAโ€ฆ? Who knows if preference is given to people who have (or havenโ€™t) exhibited beforeโ€ฆ? Who knows if decisions are based on the price of the work, or expected revenue from sales of the workโ€ฆ?

    I am not casting aspersions or making accusations about the selection process, I am merely highlighting that it is not transparent at all, it is far from the ideal way to see art, and it is certainly open to abuse. If you persist with this selection process you should make every effort to make it transparent – and not ask for irrelevant information on the application form. Some information is only relevant if the work is selected โ€“ not beforeโ€ฆ

    I mourn the days of simple transparency – when work was physically submitted and paraded in front of the selection panel โ€“ and it was sometimes filmed for all to see. This assured us that the visual impact of the whole work โ€“ with no irrelevant information โ€“ was the only selection criterion. In those halcyon days of knowing the selection panel were seeing the works in the flesh โ€“ and with no prior knowledge of the artist or the work โ€“ only then did we know that this was the most objective and honest way of a panel of RA artists making a collective subjective decisionโ€ฆ

    I fully understand that during COVID-19 there was no alternative other than to submit photographs of artwork, but now there is absolutely no excuse not to go back to the tried and tested physically present ways โ€“ the method the RA used for nearly 250 years prior to COVID. The reduced cost of using photographs and the sending of emails has considerably reduced costs to the RA Summer Exhibition, but it is to the great detriment of the exhibitorsโ€ฆ

    The Summer Exhibition is a hugely profitable source of revenue for the RA, but it relies entirely on the trust and support of artists. I will not be submitting any more works to future Summer Exhibitions unless we go back to the tried and tested way of doing it, or until the issues of transparency are completely addressed, and I urge other artists to seriously consider their positionโ€ฆ

    Yours sincerely,

    Michael Autumn